Comparison Of Sonnets 130 And 132

Matthew Valiollahi March 13, 2002 English III Research Paper A Critical Analysis of Shakespe bean Sonnets In panegyrics 130 and 132 by William Shakespeargon, they ar both similar in the fact that they are both addressed to a beautiful lady manifestly the themes of the lady are conv center of attentiond in very different ways. Shakespeares encomium 130 he says the lady is ugly but he still commends she is beautiful in her own way. While in praise 132, Shakespeare brings a new life to the women to make the praise sound much impressive. Both these Shakespearean sonnets follow the comparable with(predicate) rhyme scheme. They both pee a structure consisting of third quatrains, which are closed off with a rhyming couplet. In sonnet 130 Shakespeare has a different style in his sonnet, he shows this by completing a disputation in unity bank bill instead of development a sane both or to a greater extent pull ins for the stolon quatrain. Examples of these sta tements are in the first and second line of the sonnet, My fancy woman; eye are aught like the cheer; (Booth, 37) In this sentence Shakespeare seems to be mock the girl by saying that the eye of his mistress do not resemble the temperateness at exclusively. He past goes on to say, chromatic is far more loss than her lips red; (Jones, 132) This sentence states a different feature of his mistress qualities. Shakespeare continues to describe his mistress breasts and hair in the next dickens lines. The second quatrain starts with line five, in this quatrain, Shakespeare no longer writes with a complete statement in one line. He seems to relax, and develops his comparisons. This performer that two lines are now use to make a unit of sense. Shakespeare has employ the next two quatrains to describe her cheeks, breath, constituent and walk. Then, in the Shakespearean sonnet 132, the first two quatrains seem to be well-nigh the same thoughts, Thine eye I jockey (Senna, 11 8). The third quatrain is united to the pr! evious two quatrains as he is still toilsome to express how she should love him back with her heart. The ninth line of the sonnet seems to be an prolonged line of the second quatrain as it does not fit in with the last quatrain. This probably was because Shakespeare had not holy his descriptions of her two tenacious lamenting eyeb every(prenominal) that are more glorious than the brightly stars. This was the only unusual feature of Shakespeares sonnet structure in this sonnet. Sonnet 130 shows that Shakespeare is taking an lordly approach towards this sonnet. He shows that he truly loves his mistress, flush though she does not have hair like golden wires and eyes like suns. He writes that his mistress treads on the ground (Best, 3/10/02) rather than drifts with the air, like a traditional Shakespearean sonnet describes. He also writes that her; breasts are dun; and that opprobrious wires grow on her head. However, although he writes about all these invalidating point s, the problem is single-minded in the end when he writes in the couplet, I think my love is rare As each she belied with false compare. (Booth, 37) This means that he does not care that she does not conform to be like the commonalty woman with roses in her cheeks and a voice like music. He thinks that she is just as beautiful, or even more beautiful, than all those women that have been written about in sonnets from opposite sonneteers. In sonnet 132, Shakespeare takes on the voice of the cowcatcher lover who is in anguish and pain in the bed because his unrequited love rejects him. Her eyes are grieveing for him, discern that her; heart torments; him. Shakespeare is describing how her eyes are separate from her and think other than from the rest of her body, especially her heart. Shakespeare expresses himself by saying that her dark eyes make her whole face beautiful, like the mourning sun of heaven. He is utilize homophones such as mourning to besot the morning. Shakespeare writes that if her mourning eyes make her! self beautiful, then let it as well beseem thy heart (Jones, 132) let her heart mourn for him too and this would make her even more beautiful. He is mention her to give herself to him. Shakespeare finishes this sonnet, by writing that, if you give yourself to me, then all those that are not beautiful are those that would lack your complexion. Shakespeare employ different tones in each sonnet. There was a blunt and assertive tone in sonnet 130, where he is denying the robustness of extraordinary comparisons by rejecting all the usual common rhetorical devices and conceits as they show a false idealized beauty. Shakespeare is using conundrum against itself, this was probably seen as negative at the pickup truck clip that it was written. I believe that Shakespeare thought that the overlord common cliches of his date were no longer impressive, and decided to write a sonnet that gave a new life to the ordinary cliches to get more impressive when writing sonnet 132. Shakesp eare uses personification in this sonnet, and describes her eyes as if they, itself were humans. He writes about impossible paradox comparisons as he is trying to be impressive and witty. Shakespeare develops the original ideas for his conviction and seems to be breaking the mold with these two sonnets. If you indigence to delineate a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper