Biological and Humanistic Theories Essay

Two measurable spirit theories atomic number 18 the biologic conjecture and the human-centered conjecture. The biological theory is based on the premise that all people inherit their characteristics from their family. This theory basically contends that people do not present suss out everyplace their behaviors because they are genetically pre-determined. The humanistic theory, on the other hand, is based on the premise that severally person has free leave behind to control their actions. This theory does not go along with the idea that behaviors are pre-determined by genetics, only if chosen by the individual. These two theories sport created debates between psychologists for many yearsHans j. Eysenck, Ph.D., D.Sc., who genuine the biological theory, is one of the worlds virtually cited psychologist. He is a pioneer in the use of behavior therapy as well as research in personality theory and measurements. The biological theory has to do with his findings that indivi dual differences in personality are biology based. This was based on his theory that thither are three dimensions of personality (super situationors).These dimensions of personality were extraversion-introversion, neuroticism, and psychoticism. Eysenck likewise went a step farther in pointing out the results of many studies indicating that genetics play an important role in deciding the amounts of which of the three personality dimensions one baron experience. I agree with this theory because even most psychologists will admit that it is getting increasingly harder to ignore the obvious consort between our genetic makeup and certain(prenominal) inherited behaviors. I differ with this theory because it is difficult to test in actual experiments. Another lawsuit I disagree with this theory is that while genetics play a role in certain behaviors, it does not excuse or exempt certain actions. Lastly, this theory offers us very little in the range of personality change.Biologica l and gentlemanistics 3In humanistic theory, the motivation for developing ones full learning potential is in herent in each of us. Although there is no real definition for the humanistic theory, the four primary humanistic categories are personal responsibility, the here and now, the phenomenology of the individual, and personal growth. This theory is unlike the biological theory, in that it believes that all of us are born with the ability to hurl our own futures and are limited only by our physical limitations. The here and now is just exactly what it sounds like. Itreminds us that we should live for the present and not get caught up in the past. This has the tendency to limit what we may manufacture and leave us short of our personal goals and or objectives. The phenomenology of the individual deals with the idea that no one knows you as an individual better than you. It is ludicrous to estimate that whatsoever doctor could have any clue as to what to intimate after onl y hearing your problem a few moments earlier.This could take to be that we need to communicate our problems to someone from term to time, but one will eventually come to his or her own conclusion after circumspect reflection. The last category is Personal Growth. This process has to do with becoming a fully functioning individual achieving personal satisfaction. All of us distort to meet our immediate needs. This process resigns that once our immediate needs are met if left alone we continue to strive toward this ultimate satisfying state of being. I agree with this theory because one cannot argue the fact that each individual has control over the decisions that they make. I disagree with this theory because often of it cannot be tested in a scientific atmosphere. A vainglorious portion of this theory relies on the concept of free will, which is not apparent or predictable. Another thing that I disagree with is that in some instances a person may not be able to control some of their behaviorsBiological and Humanistic 4because of genetics. Cancer and heart disease run in families, so why wouldnt depression or drug dependency.Abraham Maslow, considered the spawn of Humanism, was an American psychologist best known for his publication A Theory of Human Motivation in which he presented his theory the power structure of human needs. This power structure of Needs can be used to explain human behaviors and emotions associated with potential. Maslows Hierarchy may show that fulfillment of potential is linked to a pre-fulfillment of all needs that may distract an individual from achieving self-actualization.Maslows hierarchy of needs is a very compelling theory due to the fact that most discussions of peoples needs in the realm of bowel movement usually begin with a basic understanding of Maslows premise. The primeval thesis of his theory is that human needs are organized in a hierarchy of five trains of basic needs. These needs include physiological nee ds, safety needs, needs of love, affection, and belongingness, needs for esteem, and the needs for self-actualization. Eventhough there are needs which sit at a higher level than these basic needs, the person does not feel the second needs until the demands of the scratch line have been satisfied, nor the third until the second has been satisfied, and so on.Between these two theories, I believe that humanistic best describes my personality. My father was a severe lush and died at the age of 53. His alcoholism destroyed my parents wedding ceremony and many other relationships in his life. By watching the effects of this bad behavior, I decided a long time ago that I would not go down the same path, especially since alcoholism might b genetic. By choosing not to engage inBiological and Humanistic 5this behavior, I have demonstrated free will of choice and motivation to change what may have been pre-determined.In conclusion I feel that both these theories possess credibility, but p ersonally I think that I would take certain aspects from both theories to create something of a collage theory. I cannot believe that we have no control over our behaviors, but at the same time it is hard to argue that genetic predisposition does not influence our personalities.ReferencesBurger, Jerry M. (2008). genius (7th edition). Retrieved December 3, 2008 fromEsource.