.

Sunday, March 31, 2019

Social and Emotional Well Being

Social and stirred up Well BeingSocial and Emotional Well BeingIntroductionSocial and aflame eudaimonia has been the theater of operations of interest for people belonging to dissimilar walks of life but n iodineffervescent it remains the least researched bea in relation to the nursing traffic (Health I, 2010). Nurses play a valuable part in patient armorial bearing as they interact directly with the patient and are also complex in decision making about the treatment at unhomogeneous spokespersons. Therefore the ability of a nurse to understand different elements influencing kindly and emotional healthful being of a individual is of critical richness (Litwin, 2011). Though current bio-medical practices have provided enough facilities and now treatment has live much easier but still human beings have particular emotional demands. Nurses time taking oversee of their patients must understand and care for various SWEB perspectives. They must also take into account t he cultural values, family kinetics, relationship conflicts and communion barriers a patient faces. Without having stark(a) understanding of a patients emotional and tender situation it is impossible to ensure environment facilitating purloin headspringnesscare delivery.In the present literature at that place are different opinions about the importance of cordial and emotional upbeat perspectives and their reference in assuring suitable environment for wellnesscare delivery. The coming paragraphs will contend opinions of various authors in relation to these perspective and then a shoemakers last will be drawn as to how understanding of different dynamics of SEWB becomes imperative for a nurse.Bio-medical pretence says that health is a condition wherein a person does not face any kind of disability or disease. Proponents of this model are deeply obsessed by the concepts of biochemical and morbific origin of the disease (Kobau et al., 2011). While on the other hand, the re are many scholars (Wang et al., 2010, Latwin et al. 2010 etc) who believe that social and emotional wellbeing is as chief(prenominal) as the animal(prenominal) health of a person. In simpler words wellbeing can be c eached as existence of satisfactory condition. jibe to bio medical ledger (2011) a person aspiring to create the environment of complete social and emotional well-being must be able to receive the need by coping with the environgenial pressures. Social and personal resources and physical capacities of a person all can be brought under the comprehensive of social and emotional well being (BMJ, 2011). Here it is important to contend between the concept of social and emotional well being amongst endemical and the opinion of mental health amongst non-indigenous settings. In indigenous settings the idea of social and emotional well-being comes more from the culture, land, spirituality, family values and how all these elements affect health and life of a person. Wh ile on the other hand, mental health amongst non-indigenous people focuses more on clinical perspectives and the level of functioning of a person in social environment (Larson et al., 2009). Marmot (2010) says that in the culture of aboriginals and Torres Islanders the social and emotional well-being cannot be achieved solely by achieving physical health instead there is a need to cover a broad(a) range of issues including trauma, violence, abuse and domestic conflicts.Wang et al. (2010) raises the concept of social and emotional well-being of aboriginals state that complex, multi-dimensional model of healthcare cannot work without appropriate understanding and communication. severally and every person should work according to the clear lines of responsibilities. They must register capability and capacity to support and assume the responsibility of joint care in health management system (Wang et al., 2010). It means that Nurses and doctors should try to affectionate various s ocial factors that affect the physical and mental condition of a patient. Wang et al. (2010) also argue that the sinless system cannot work in closing off and here is a need to boost linkage amongst all the players by communication and understanding.For healthcare providers it is critical to understand different perceptions of health be creator they cannot help a diverse range of people one by utilizing sterile principles. Here it is also important to note that there cannot be one model to cater the needs of all patients instead an structured move up should be substantial based on human understanding. Each model can prove be suitable to one condition for which it has been developed and not for every patient facing different health issues (Kobau et al., 2010). doubting Thomas et al. (2010) believes that the indigenous concept of social and emotional well-being is more legal because it works on the grassroots principles of human health. It takes into account community, family , spirituality and ancestry. tout ensemble these elements provide a person with a unique reservoir of convalescence when he has o face adversity (Thomas et al., 2010).In the above context, in order to bring social and emotional well-being in a community it is critical to understand cultural and behavioral dimensions of a persons well-being. But in contrast to the above proponents of the Medical pretense and genial Health Plan believe that mental health is all about achieving condition wherein a person is able to interact socially. He must be able to cope with the social stress while on the job(p) in a productive manner and having optimum opportunities for development.For instance Helliwell et al. (2010) oppose the concept of SEWB as presented by the aboriginal community say that this is a broader concept that puts emphasizes on changing society instead of changing the condition of the person who is ill. In most of the cases it is possible to reshape the entire society and the effort can become a time waste. On the other hand, if focus is maintained on reshaping the health condition of a person, good results can be obtained (Helliwell et al., 2010).Huber et al. (2011) also reinforce the above base saying that peak point focus on the social and emotional well being of a person withdraws upkeep from the basic principles of diagnosis. More help is given to changing the society instead of reshaping the health condition of the patient. This is an extreme cash advance according to which the person who is affected must not be dealt for his illness and the entire society should be forced to change.Yoon et al. (2008) also potently criticize the social and emotional well being concept saying that this idea is disruptive as it brings a lot of confusion and shifts the attention of the healthcare provider from the basic principles of medicine to completely a different onset that is also impractical. This approach does not help anyone understand the cause of dis ease or disability (Yoon et al., 2008). Yoon et al. (2008) also believe that the concept of SEWB denies the diagnostic criterion that is set to identify the origin and cause of a disease. breathing definitions of physical and mental ailments do not fit to this concept. According to him this idea is also unrealistic because if society could play a strong role to change one person then everyone else living in the equivalent society must change and experience the same symptoms.ConclusionTorres Islanders and Aboriginals favor the concept of social and emotional health and well-being and while working with them it becomes even more important to take care of what they believe in. many another(prenominal) scholars also favor this idea saying that this is the perspective that shows positive and holistic approach to the physical and emotional well being of a person. According to them social, emotional, physical well being cannot be achieved without a holistic approach that focuses on the life of families, communities and individuals. A nurse working on the basic principles of social and emotional well-being can participate in the corporate care plan very effectively. She can also participate in the healthcare programs designed for patients coming from a diverse range of backgrounds and cultures. through and through such practices patients are also empowered and a range of needs and problems of these people who come to find treatment are addressed. Though there are opposing views as well and many believe that extreme focus on these dynamics can withdraw attention of the healthcare provider from the actual matter. However, in my opinion the social and emotional well being should be taken into account while finalizing the medical approach for treatment. It helps the medical practitioner to identify the cause and origin of a specific health condition and then suitable treatment options such as medication, change of environment, counseling and other remedies can be sug gested. This the only modality to appreciate the role of society that it plays in changing the physical and mental state of a person. Without appropriate diagnosis of a patients state and origin of his disability or disease cannot be place and finally suitable treatment options can also not be selected.ReferencesHeath, I. (2010). Conceptual Explorations on Person-centered Medicine 2010 Person-centered prevention and health promotion.International journal of integrated care,10(Suppl).Helliwell, J. F., Wang, S. (2010).Trust and well-being(No. w15911). National Bureau of Economic Research.Huber, M., Knottnerus, J. A., Green, L., Horst, H. V. D., Jadad, A. R., Kromhout, D., Smid, H. (2011). How should we define health?.BMJ-British Medical ledger,343(6), d4163.Kobau, R., Seligman, M. E., Peterson, C., Diener, E., Zack, M. M., Chapman, D., Thompson, W. (2011). Mental health promotion in public health perspectives and strategies from positive psychology.American Journal of Public He alth,101(8).Litwin, H., Shiovitz-Ezra, S. (2011). Social network type and subjective well-being in a national sample of older Americans.The Gerontologist,51(3), 379-388..Larson, A., Gillies, M., Howard, P. J., Coffin, J. (2009). Its enough to make you dingy the impact of racism on the health of Aboriginal Australians.Australian and New Zealand journal of public health,31(4), 322-329.Marmot, M. (2010). Social determinants of health inequalities.The Lancet,365(9464), 1099-1104.Thomas, A., Cairney, S., Gunthorpe, W., Paradies, Y., Sayers, S. (2010). Strong Souls development and validation of a culturally appropriate tool for assessment of social and emotional well-being in Indigenous youth.Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry,44(1), 40-48.Yoon, E., Lee, R. M., Goh, M. (2008). Acculturation, social connectedness, and subjective well-being.Cultural renewing and Ethnic Minority Psychology,14(3), 246.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.