Shakespeare, Reason and Love

Lovers and madmen have such(prenominal) seething brains,\nSuch make fantasies, that apprehend\nMore than nerveless solid ground ever comprehends. (MSD 4-5)\n\nThis commendation taken from Shakespeares A summer solstice darks Dream encapsulates that which lies at the very heart of the play; the character of bonk. Shakespeares exploration of crawl in and reason comes through the differing sets of effrs presented in the play. From the more rational fit of Athens (Theseus and Hippolyta) toward the more ridiculous woods (Oberon and Titania). Amidst these two differentiate places, exist the four new-made lovers (Lysander, Demetrius, Helena and Hermia) who straddle some(prenominal) these settings and thus could be a consideration for both reason and love. As such, the play asks questions of love in relation to a world of reason and rationality. perchance as a floor to, or rather alongside A Midsummer Nights Dream, it is important to fashion at the philosophical arguments o f Plato - oddly in the Phaedrus. Though its ace concern rests with the art of rhetoric, the dialogue between Socrates and Phaedrus also go on the nature of love along with considerations on the soulfulness and divine madness. The overabundant focus will rejoin within Socrates first and befriend language. This essay seeks to explore this affinity between reason and love, conscription comparisons between Shakespeares A Midsummer Nights Dream and Platos the Phaedrus. \n\n reason and Love in the Phaedrus \nThe Phaedrus backside be seen as underpinning Shakespeares musings on reason and love, oddly in A Midsummer Nights Dream, and objet dart perhaps superfluous, it would be ill-informed to issue Platos work. In resolution to Lysias, Socrates first speech tells the composition of a boy or youth described as having very gentlemans gentlemany lovers (237b). whiz of these men persuaded the boy that he was not in love, though he loved the associate no less than others (237b ). The man made a speech to convince the boy to gi...